Find a Lawyer

MESSRS RASOOLAN BIBI versus AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN THROUGH JOINT DIRECTOR

Section 9, 10, 22 and 24 of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 132 (c) sued by the bank that the appellants were in a position to restrict and defend the suit for recovery of debt. Was banned when there was a time limit. Three years, but no lawsuit was filed before the expiration of the term, the bank cited Article 132 (c) of the Limitation Act, 1908, and submitted that where the title was with the purpose of obtaining the applicable property Documents were received through submission. The payment, the limit was 12 years and the bank approved the loan of the appellant upon submission of the passbook seed pass book which did not have the title document as contemplated in Article 132 of the Limitation Act, 1908, so that the appellant deposited. Doers can be attracted to. A specific question of law and facts, namely, the restriction, the determination to leave, he was entitled to leave, the imposed judgment and injunction, was set aside and left to appear and defend the case. Was made and the appellants were all reduced to filing a written statement within the stipulated period and the matter was referred to the banking court as per law. top advocate from Ghizer lawyer