Find a Lawyer

ABDUL RAHIM versus MUHAMMAD ALI

The second appeal suit for the specific performance of the S12 sale agreement was claimed by the plaintiff before his death, with the plaintiff's original owner contracting for the sale of the shop in his favor. The deceased had received the full payment for the suit shop and had also handed over the shop to the plaintiff, and the defendants, who were the legal representative of the deceased, refused to perform their part of the agreement. For specific performance of the contract or for alternatives. He allegedly refused to recover the money owed to the original owner of the shop if his predecessor ever agreed to sell the suit shop to the plaintiff or receive any money from it. Denied that the suit shop was ever occupied. After recording the evidence of the plaintiff's trial cases and the parties, the appeal filed by the plaintiff against the judgment of the trial court was also dismissed; Failed to indicate not reading the evidence. By presenting the evidence on record, the plaintiff proved that he had never executed the sale agreement, received any money or money and handed over the suit shop to the plaintiffs under the circumstances, in the appropriate judgment of the courts. Was rightly dismissed - based on the proper definition of evidence on record, the second appeal could not be interrupted \ r \ n \ r \ n list of supreme court advocates from FR Bannu lawyer