PERVAIZ versus STATE
Section 497 (2) Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 337A (ii), 337F (i), 148 and 149 Guarantees, Grant no further injury to the complainant and medical person of the Inquiries. ? The evidence contradicted the prosecution's contentious stand and the FIR was filed with an unspecified delay of 24 hours, despite the fact that the police station was adjacent to the site of the incident and other members of his party were also investigated. Was not done In the FIR and this pressure reflected negative on the complainant of the prosecutor's story, although it was mentioned in the FIR that the accused took the complainant out of his house and assaulted him in a street, But the dispute was undoubtedly in the public debate and there was no evidence in the file. Such an element charged further inquiries to show which of the parties was the attacker and that fact would be decided by the trial court after the recording of the evidence. While on physical remand and the individual was no longer needed for interrogation purposes, there was no possibility of the accused's fugitives or tampering with the evidence of the prosecution; the bail was not to be withheld as a guarantee and Further detention of the accused would not proceed to the prosecution case in which any felony was charged. The defendant, when the case was filed for his post-arrest bail after the case was registered, allowed him to remain on trial pending trial, resulting in a trial. As a result of the trial, after the trial when he was granted bail after the trial
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Lalamusa lawyer