Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MST. AMNA BANO versus BASHIR AHMAD


Sections 5, 13 and 35 (2) of the Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O VII, R 11 Pre-trial Trial 21 4 1992 Rejecting a Trial by Appellate Court After Discharge Affordability was banned. The Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1991 came into force and was, therefore, within the suit filed within one year of sale, the Shariat Appellate Bench of the Supreme Court decided by section 35 of the PLD 1994 SC1. (2). The rationale behind this decision of the 31st 1993 Supreme Court PLD 1994 could not have been separated from the PLD case of Syed Kamal Shah, as opposed to the integration of Islam with regard to the period of one year of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1991. The 1986 SC 360 suit was not ordered at any stage till 31 12 1993. The plaintiffs could neither avail nor protect the section 35 (2) of the Punjab Pre-Impression Act, 1991, therefore, the High Court This edit has been denied

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law firms from Jamshoro lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.