Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus MEMBER (COLONIES), BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE

Article 199 In relation to the auctioned land, the proprietor's rights participated in the auction proceedings, in which the bid of the applicant was the highest which was sent to the Deputy Commissioner for approval, which was not approved. And said that the decision of the Deputy Commissioner has been upheld. Authorities Petition filed a constitutional petition against the denial of proprietary rights in relation to the land; the petition filed by the petitioner for the grant of proprietary rights on the basis of his participation in the auction proceedings, which was not approved by the authorities. Have no right The applicant was merely a participant in the auction proceedings unless it had been approved by the authorized authority until the applicant failed to show that the unauthorized orders approved by the competent authority were relevant. The rules and regulations are violated and the unanimous result of the constitutional petition cannot be violated. Under the High Court, sTribunals had no jurisdiction to change the position of the Tribunals under Article 199 of the Constitution, but as an arbitrator in the constitutional jurisdiction, the High Court did not apply to the applicant. Had refused to make a similar decision in favor of which this request was not raised. They are, in the circumstances, below the constitutional request before the tribunals online advocate from Bhan Saeedabad lawyer