MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE/JUSTICE OF PEACE, KABIRWALA, DISTRICT KHANEWAL
Section 154, 22A and 22B of Pakistan (1973) Article 199 Constitutional petition sought the reinstatement of the applicant seeking a criminal case against the respondents, who allegedly confiscated the wheat at gunpoint. The bags were taken away. The Sessions Judge / Justice of the Peace dismissed his request for registration of a case against the respondents as usual on the petitioner's request, without exercising his equitable mind regarding the facts and circumstances of the petition. The petition sought an opinion regarding the relevant Section H, in his comment, stating that there was no alleged incident as per his investigation. Section HA also stated that there was a dispute between the parties regarding payment of some amount, if the applicant had any evidence against the respondents of the commission of the criminal offense, it would be appropriate for him to suffer. Instead of filing a private complaint in a court of competent jurisdiction, after the police who were not ready to accept their opinion, only a competent jurisdiction court, after recording the applicant's strong evidence, against the respondents The summons may be issued and if he is found guilty he may be punished according to the law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Padidan lawyer