MUHAMMAD NAEEM KHAN versus STATE
Articles 409, 420, 468, 471, 411 and 109 of the National Accountability Ordinance (XVIII of 1999), definitions of sections 10, 11 and 15 have been charged with a reduction in sentence which did not contest the merits, Said he was following this principle. In relation to the punishment imposed on the co-accused, he referred to the judgment passed by another High Court Bench against the co-accused in the case when the co-accused was less punished and here Until then, the punishment was reduced to three years in each. Counsel for the Council presented by the National Accountability Bureau referred to the provisions of Section 11 of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, saying that the fines were also reduced, and that the fines should also be in accordance with the unfair advantage brought by the accused. And should not be underestimated. The indictment alleges that the court may follow the provisions of Article 11 of the National Accountability Ordinance 1999 on the German case. The accused was sentenced to prison, reduced to three years, but the trial court's decision regarding the amount of fines was retained \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Guddu lawyer