Find a Lawyer

ZAFAR IQBAL versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH COLLECTOR GUJRAT

The Collector's Additional Commissioner (Revenue) confirmed the appeal for change of inheritance passed in favor of the deceased daughter by section 42, West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), sections 42, 44 and 164 through Lombard. Variation canceled for non-authentication. It is not permissible to mention the name of the daughter in the village and genealogy table. Both such reasons are not permissible for depriving a person of the inheritance rights and the pedigree table prepared before the birth of the plaintiff was not considered. So the agricultural tribes were leaving in Central Punjab. Under the customary practice, where no daughters are usually inherited, the name of a woman, not entitled to inheritance under the customs, was not to be included in the ethnic table, as evidenced by the variation / jambandi of the plaintiff's testimony. The statements were prepared on the basis of fact. The deceased's daughter could not be shaken during the cross examination. The plaintiff's birth registration is 75 years old. She showed her the proof of the deceased's daughter and found her grandfather's name in such a case. The source was not canceled, will have its own separate value and cannot be denied because the victim was not resident in the plaintiff. The Commissioner's birth commissioner exceeded the jurisdiction not to relinquish the dispute as the defendant's daughter by a civil court defendant her r \ n \ r \ n top advocates from Khangarh lawyer