COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS versus MESSRS FATIMA ENTERPRISES LIMITED
Article 18 The Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) imposed customs duty on the measurement of oil while import duty was a dispute over the return of duty, the Supreme Court in the constitutional jurisdiction instructed the authorities to Measure bulk oil. Authorities have said that the High Court cannot decide the facts in its constitutional jurisdiction because there was no solid evidence on record to accept such facts and thus the authorities faced serious prejudice. If in the future the authorities will be instructed to measure the oil in the shore tank, which tank remains under the control of consignment, no checking on theft or pelvic refrigeration and the Customs Department will lose their responsibility according to customs. Will be done. The Act, 1969, and other law-abiding authorities further claimed that the Division Bench of the High Court rejected this letter. The Central Board of Revenue added on 7-7 1992 without any justification in the law that more by the authorities The argument was that the Customs Act itself provided appropriate and alternative treatment to a bereaved person, but there was no constitutional request to question the facts without taking advantage of it. The Supreme Court allowed the Supreme Court to consider the privileges of the High Court before the leave of the High Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
