MST. AZRA PARVEEN versus PAKISTAN CRICKET BOARD THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE
Article 199 In order to uphold the constitutional application to hide material facts, the petitioner filed a civil suit on the same facts, which was not mentioned in the petition in which the copy of the civil suit was not attached to the application for comparison. Gone, the constitutional jurisdiction in effect was arbitrary. The High Court hid the material facts, which were fatal in nature. The High Court refused to use its discretion in favor of the petitioner in concealing the material facts in the constitutional petition's contents in the interest of the court. The requests were directed to the authorities and the authorities were instructed to examine the matter and to pass the appropriate order as per law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Mangowal lawyer
