Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 377 and 34 of the Crimes (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 12 bail, further inquiry filed with the grant of FIR, with noticeable delay The murder case was carried out without any witnesses and the accused was not named in the FIR in any capacity and his name was introduced through the supplementary statement given by the complainant witness for the alleged extra-judicial confession. Went to the Investigation Officer three days later with a statement regarding the extra-judicial confession. The joint confession before the witnesses was based on the confession of the accused and his accomplices for the alleged confession of the crime and of significant importance, the said evidence and the alleged extra-judicial confession was suspected and the clear evidence of the final evidence will be dismissed. At the time of the trial, no other evidence was directly linked to the accused by the trial court, which had already been presented after the completion of the investigation, any benefit from the continued detention of the accused in jail. Failure to fulfill the objective was not possible, the accused is 16 years old and challan accused against him. In the circumstances which were brought before the Juvenile Court, the provisions were drawn. The first section of sub-section (1) of section 497, in addition to the CCP, also attracts the provisions of section 10 of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance 2000, under section 497, section (2) of C.R. He is entitled to grant bail in the case against the accused who demands further investigation of his crime. PC, he was out on bail power of attorney advocate Patika lawyer