Find a Lawyer

SHAUKAT ALI versus STATE

For purposes of sections 161, 162 and 439 law marriages (10 of 1984), Article 140 objects and section 1602, CCP intended to legislate in the form of section 162, CRPC, for the use of statements. Was to protect the accused. Regarding the witnesses, they were presented to the police during the investigation, on the assumption that it was stated that statements were not made in the circumstances affecting the trust, Section 162, to seek CCP through the media. Was considered to have been used for any purpose against the statement while it was enforced the absolute bar and the accused had turned his attention to the manner described in Article 140 of the Law Martyrs, 1984. The ability to rely on a witness for the limited purpose of contradicting a witness, be it a prosecution or a defense witness, or even a The testimony of a court cannot be used for cohesion, nor can it be used by a prosecution to defend or defend a court witness. The testimony of the law was 1984, the control of 5 of 5 was controlled by the CCPC, and its prohibition was in the section contained62. The CRPC cannot be defeated in the statement of evidence which was stated by the prosecution. Was, to be ignored as evidence, inadmissible criminal advocate from Vehari lawyer