Section 2 (b (b) Qatil Ahmad) Testimony of evidence The benefit of the doubt was that the two eyewitnesses were witnesses of the occasion because they were not residents of the area where the incident occurred, but they were residents of a different area whose evidence There was a dispute with the evidence. The medical evidence in the ocular account and medical evidence raised serious suspicion about the presence of witnesses at the relevant time, the recovery of the pistol 30 bore on the suspect's identification was unnecessary. There is no report of the Franzic Science Laboratory related to the incident. There was no benefit to the recovery of the pistol, the prosecutor's motive was not proven when the evidence of the prosecutor was unable to be relied upon in the case. The story of the prosecution and the accused's version was put in a Justice position, then the accused's The version, more likely prosecco, did not prove its case against the suspects beyond the shadow of a doubt.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
