The right to object to the execution of the order for the specific performance of the sale contract under section 47 and AXXI, RR 100, 103 of the Transfer Property Act (IV of 1882), section 41 and 52 constitution of Pakistan, Article 10A. The request was an object request. That his sale contract was in the first place and that in his partial operation he had possession of the suit land and his specific performance case was pending when the sale of the fraudulent contract with the seller on the basis of the contract. I received the decree in such order and seized the suit with him. In his execution dismissing the request for objection by the Land Implementation Court, the petitioner did not disclose the seller's contract in his written statement in the objection filed by the defendant in his particular custody because he had not dealt with the issue. Without notice. The execution court legally held that it should issue a question on the part of the parties to resolve the same objection and record the evidence. Similarly, separate cases related to the same case will be banned under AXXI, R 100 & 103, the CPC executive court dismissed the objection illegally when it was observed that the objection was made. Were not the parties under which the decree was passed under execution. Lease pendens will protect the rights of the objection There was no cure and forum left after the objection to its objection, without giving the complainant a fair opportunity to be heard, the execution court dismissing the petition. Violated its fundamental right protected under Article 10A
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
