A. VII, R 11 (c) Denial of plaintiff's reduction in suit court fee for receipt of money based on promise note. Determination of court fee The plaintiff requested the plaintiff's denial on the request that the plaintiff meet with the plaintiff. No court fees. Applying for a dismissal to the plaintiff, the plaintiff claimed that he had submitted the required court fee, consequently the application was rejected and the order was reviewed, O VII, R 11, Due to a claimant's failure to attract CPC delivery. Judicial fees need a good reduction, a court fee must be determined and then the time needed to complete the reduction is required even though the plaintiff was instructed to submit the court fee but the amount was not determined. And generally will not be penalized on such an order. The results stated in O VII, R 11, CPC were claimed by the claimant, therefore, no court mandate was required to determine the exact amount of court fees. 15,000 / - instead of Rs.15000 / - by the plaintiff and that was not enough to show greed in favor of the plaintiff without any justification and the plaintiff's behavior was nothing but prejudice and it was in fact a trial. There was a hearing and a trial. The court did not justify granting the premiums to the plaintiffs order that the plaintiffs reject the request for dismissal and the jurisdiction over the jurisdiction of the jurisdiction of the reviewing jurisdiction over which the two orders were made. Was set aside and the plaintiff was dismissed under O. VII, R 11, the amendment to the CPC was allowed accordingly.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
