Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD DIDAR KHAN versus STATE

Definitions of Section 9 (c) Evidence The material contradictions appeared in the statements of two recovery witnesses and the recovery memo, one of the prosecution's witnesses said that Chars was recovered from the ground by the victim, the other witness for the prosecution. Deposed that he was lying below the chars. The bedside occupied the suspect in the living room, but in cross-examination, witnesses said that the chars were buried underground Recovery memo indicates a restoration from the shopping bag under the bedside site recovered from a room. Holly, who was located in the residence, said that special possession of the room suspect was not established and no evidence was brought to the record to prove how the suspect was occupying. In the premises, the accused told that the effect of the recovery was conveyed to the other person, who was arrested by the police. Ka and the suspect were imprisoned and the victim's goat as he was working as a laborer near Reissi. I had made a serious case, the prosecution had failed to prove my case against the accused beyond any reasonable doubt, the trial court's decision was disputed and the accused acquitted. Charge advocate from FR Tank / DI Khan lawyer