Find a Lawyer

MESSRS RAVI ENTERPRISES THROUGH PROPRIETOR versus ALLIED BANK OF PAKISTAN

Section 9 and 10 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), suit for recovery of money by application of section 10 and 11 suit bank leave, for the first time the case for damages established by the defendant against the bank in which the bank The suit proceeded directly and substantially in the case of Bank Validity Sections 10 and 11, the discharge of leave application in favor of the CPC and the approval of the order, as applicable section 9 (2) of the banking companies (loans, advances , Credit and finance receipts) Act 1997. In connection with the cases filed under the Act, the application of section 10, CPC, the High Court set aside the decree passed in favor of the defendant on the charge of damages, the defendant obtaining financial support and acknowledging the implementation of the documents. But claimed that no case had been made. The High Court, in defense of the suit bank, filed a case for recovery of Rs. 84, 71,000 for which the original amount was Rs. 5,100 million, in view of the suit being applied for damages. The court was granted conditional leave and the defendants were directed to submit a bank guarantee within two months and submit a guaranteed bond of Rs 3 1 million within two months. The High Court accepted the appeal, dismissing the improper decision / order. Rejected and approved of such conditional. After fulfilling such condition by the respondent, leave the order of the banking court to decide, otherwise the leave application will be considered as dismissed. law firms from Dinga lawyer