SAIFULLAH versus STATE
Further investigation in section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 392, 395, 411 and 412, FIR was not the name of the accused's grant, but in the complainant's supplementary statement, it was named in the offenders. Was added. More than three months after the alleged robbery was recovered from the accused in four wagon seats, a pedan and two iron bodies said that the identity of the wagon was not paraded, without any explanation. The defendant's statement can hardly be said that the identity parade was not held in this case, it was clear that there was a further investigation into the crime of the accused, the accused was admitted in bail. I
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from Kallat lawyer
