Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKBAR YOUSUFZAI versus MUHAMMAD SABIR

Section 13 Civil Code (v. 1908), Section 115 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), Section 42 suit for the declaration of a claim that the claimant was the owner of the property with a prayer for the decree of possession of the property. In relation to the tenant and the tenant, the civil court, having the jurisdiction of the final court, both courts have found that the plaintiff is the owner of the disputed shop, based on the registered sale deed and defendant's version. This property was sold. The suit was different from the registered cell deed and it was an open plan, the two courts dismissing the fact finding evidence based on the fact of the evidence together, which resulted in the correctness of the results of both the courts. Are. An examination of the evidence on the record, no misreading or non-reading was identified, together with the fact of the fact being recorded by the court of competent jurisdiction by the courts. Widnes cannot be interfered with by the High Court in the exercise of the jurisdiction of the review advocate from Rajanpur lawyer