SAJJAD ALIAS SAJOO versus STATE
Section 2302 (b) was the testimony, opportunity and extraordinary testimony of eyewitnesses and their statements could not be relied on without the independent endorsement of the statement. There was no direct interviewer, nor was his direct interest set on record in the murder of the victim. No weapons were recovered from the suspect's possession. The accused's molestation could not be legally proven but the image Medical evidence could not possibly be corroborated to support the account, which would not prove itself a crime. I um. The defendants were acquitted on the benefit of the doubt in the circumstances when all the other pieces of the prosecution's evidence proved untrustworthy.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates contact from Sihala lawyer