Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

AGHA NADEEM versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB


Section 23 and 27 Dangerous Drugs Act (Second 1930), Section 14 Punjab Drug Rules, 1988, R4 (3) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition FIR Notice issued by the government to the accused Unable to allow a drug inspector to file a case against them, which required Rule 4 (3) of the Punjab Drug Rules 1988, was a government analyst report on the pattern of drug degradation. Even the accused was not provided, which could not challenge it under Section 22 of the Drugs Act 1976, saying that even though the report was not final, registration of the case against the accused was without legal authority or Vehari. I could not even register that the crime was allegedly committed by the Lahore High Court, under section 249A or 265, without the transfer of the trial court by the accused, who was capable of terminating the criminal proceedings on the basis of a false complaint. K, CRPC lodges case with FIR against accused

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
criminal advocate from Chak 4 b c lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.