Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AZAM versus STATE

Section 302 evidence was not defined in the FIR, two FIR details were given in the FIR but no identification parade was made in the case before the three persons were named in the trial case. Had been recovered because there was no recovery effect from the accused. The medical evidence of the defendant contradicted the ocular testimony, the benefit of the doubt was extended to the accused in the circumstances and accordingly he was acquitted. best advocate from Yazman Mandi lawyer