Find a Lawyer

ABDUL HAMEED versus MEMBER (REVENUE), BOARD OF REVENUE AND OTHERS

R7A West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Sections 42 and 166 of Pakistan (1973), Arts 13 (A) and 212 (3) dismissal of civil servants who were the Deputy Tehsildars, Kongo and Patwari. The allegations of corruption against public servants were based on a former party decree passed by a civil judge, in favor of the Department of Public Works, and the provincial government, to approve the change of land. To move forward. The order of the appellant without the permission of the district collector, and consequently, with unreasonable motives and unreasonable intent, was granted by the Supreme Court of the Appeal to the Supreme Court Ben Elias for consideration of these questions. Veterans who were targeted. In the two inquiry proceedings in which he was acquitted of the charges, a third time a de novo inquiry can be made without recording valid reasons. Can the applicant, who was given a minor sentence for two increments withheld after the showcase notice, which was not challenged by him, be prosecuted on the same charges and against Article 13 (a) of the Constitution? He may be punished for the violation. The Islamic Republic of Pakistan Were the applicants not obligated under Section 42 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967, in accordance with the decision and order of the court, which could not be entered into and dismissed, and any executive instructions regarding admission and approval? Variations may result in removal of legal provisions. Whether the applicant against whom the allegations of corruption or corruption were not proven and acknowledged that the government famous supreme court advocate from Jehangira lawyer