Find a Lawyer

ZAFAR IQBAL HAMEED KHAN versus ASHIQ HUSSAIN AND 2 OTHERS

Article 13 Ordinance of the West Pakistan Civil Courts (III of 1962), Section 18 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The Court of Nodal Factor Determining the Importance of Appeal to the Supreme Court Was in favor of the fairy. The First Appellate Court High Court upheld the ruling and the ruling under the use of the second appeal, the decisions of the two courts were set aside, the former umpire filed for leave to appeal before the Supreme Court. The objection was raised that the case is more of a case. More than Rs. 50,000, therefore, was directly appealable under Article 185 (2) of the Constitution and not the petition for leave of appeal by the petitioner, under section 18 of the West Pakistan Civil Courts Ordinance, 1962. The factor determining the availability or non-availability depended on the cost of the right to appeal and in the present case the price in the suit was fixed at Rs. 8,694. High Court under section 18 of the West Pakistan Civil Court Ordinance, 1962. Etc. were not ruled, but they were regulated by Article 185 (2) of the Constitution, which is also in section 18 of the West Pakistan Civil Courts Ordinance, 1962 Was provided, there was irrelevant supply to the solution. The dispute was Article 185 (2) (d) of the Constitution, which declared that the issue of dispute should be a determining factor as opposed to the provisions of section 18 of the West Pakistan Civil Court Ordinance, 1962, Has been talked about The actual cost of the dispute to guide the guidance element is more than $ 50,000, subject to appeal under Article 185 (2) of the Constitution and the application under Article 185 (3) of the Constitution. immigration advocate from Akhora Khattak lawyer