Find a Lawyer

TEHSIL MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION versus CHAUDHRY & CO.

Article 10 and 11 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) confirms the increase in the auction of non-bidder bid for the right of recovery; fixed reserve price for the auction has been fixed while the highest bidder of the respondents is union. Defendant's bid was not confirmed by the council because an unregistered person offered Rs 5,12,00,000 when the highest bidder suspended the union council act in a constitutional petition. Was accepted by the High Court Playa. The Council was that the cancellation of the auction was submitted by the Council which was used properly and should not have been interfered with by the High Court. About Rs 1,17,00,000 was more than the reserve price of the respondent. It was sufficient bid to reject such bid and cancel the auction, therefore, it was notorious as well as the rules given to the incentive council. Had to use their power. Rules and Regulations Exceeding the Case Condition There was no reason available under the rules to cancel the auction; the council did so because of the intervention of an unregistered person, and the High Court dismissed those involved. Was. Supreme Court denies interference in High Court's decision to grant leave to appeal top civil advocates from Rashidabad lawyer