MUHAMMAD ALI versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB
Sections 30 and 36 of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Sections 42 and 54 of the Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), Sections 9, O VII, R 11 and O XXXIX, R1, 2 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) In the case of issue relating to the case taken under the Temporary Farming Scheme, a challenge order was filed by the appellate court for the resignation of the plaintiff and the dismissal of the order, under which the collector challenged. No order has been filed against O VII, R 11, CPC on the ground that the appeal against such order was dismissed on the ground that the civil court had jurisdiction under section 36 of the Government Land (Punjab) Colonization Act, 1912. Stop the source Was granted, the High Court dismissed the appeal against the order dismissing the plaintiff's argument. The plaintiff was that the appellate court could not reject the plaintiff while dealing with the matter when the Institute of Suite Validity had not benefited the plaintiff for three years through legal means of appeal and review. The Easter Commissioner and the Board of Revenue, respectively, did not disclose, against the order of the Collector Plaintiff, that the Collector's order was illegal or beyond his authority, or that he had any jurisdiction so that the civil court could have jurisdiction over the High Court. So as not to get remand for a good cause. Supreme Court dismisses plea on the ground of strange facts and in the circumstances of this case to dismiss the case independently of the court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Babri Banda lawyer