Section (94 (?), (78 ()) (d) and Cri 82 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (v. 1898), Sections 265C and 265F, Pakistan, Article 10A) provided for fraudulent educational qualification when contesting general elections I was accused of conducting a trial of testimonial testimony \ fair trial \ and violating the right to due process \ evidence on the side of the conviction that he was contesting the general election held in 2008. A fake and fake educational qualification was presented by the Regional Election Commissioner Trial Court convicted the offender under Section 82 of the Representation People Act 1976 and sentenced him to 3 years imprisonment. Vepe was fined while he was acquitted of the charges under Sections 200, 468 and 471, PPC, and the trial court proceeded with the trial on a daily basis so that the trial could not be decided after a certain date. In order to result in panic and panic, the trial judge decided not to follow any legal law, and to not follow any legal law for crimes heard under the Public Representation Act 1976 ? In view of Section 9 (2) of the said Act, trial was mandatory and neither the complainant has recorded his statement in the present case nor did he present any testimony by the complainant to prove his claim. The statement was merely a statement of the complainant's lawyer's statement, where it was stated that the lawyer presented some documents with evidence and the trial judge brought all such documents to the exhibition without looking at the fact. Whether or not the documents are admissible in evidence, counsel for the complainant in the witness box
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
