Section 2302 (b) (c) praised the evidence and that the incident of sudden provocation was admitted in this case, the participant was not denied in the incident, but the manner and manner of the incident was controversial. It was the case of the prosecution who had released the accused. From his shalwar address, a pistol and a victim called to avenge his humiliation, and fired five pistol shots at the victim's chest, splints and both arms, leaving him without wounds. Broke. In the defendant's statement under section 2342 in the case against him, the CCP held that the defendant stopped his sister on the way, grabbed her by the arm and told her to run away with him, but she refused. Given that he was watching with her the whole incident, so intense and sudden outrage that he opened fire with his pistol and killed the accused, both of them were kept, one prosecution took over and the other accused, in his statement. Section 342, CRPC, on the occasion of justification, both the prosecution witnesses were in accordance with their statements, in the statements of both eyewitnesses on the material points There was no contradiction. His statements had the full backing of the medical evidence, the FIR was immediately filed with the prosecution in the case, in which case, without any doubt, the defendant was able to prove the case, relevant witnesses The evidence of could not be excluded on a relationship basis. If the evidence of such witnesses rings, then the accused did not present any evidence in evidence of his defense request. And on oath appearing in his defense under section 340 (2)
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
