MUMTAZ versus STATE
Section 200 and 439 Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/201/148/149/109/337 F (iv) / 337 A (ii) Second Complaint Second Complaint filed after more than one year of filing The first complaint went to the accused and four years after the FIR was registered in connection with the same incident, the second private complaint was recorded after the initial statements of the complainant and other witnesses were bound by all the named defendants. The order was not valid in the four years after the presence of the other person, with similar facts and against the addition of the same accused against almost the same accused in accordance with the legal provisions, nor was the offender guilty. According to the conduct of the courts, no rational explanation was offered for the delay of four years in the filing of the second complaint. Otherwise they were not required to be entertained. Without any legal basis, according to the trial court's direction, Accordingly, in the first complaint, a request for revision was allowed, after the conclusion of the proceedings and in order to proceed with the challan case.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Feroz Watan lawyer