Find a Lawyer

SHAMSHER ALI versus STATE

The testimony of the section 302 (b) evidence was not only related to the prosecution's testimony, but they also hated the accused, and their co-accused stated that they lived about five acres away from the incident. It was unanimously said in the presence of the spot at the relevant time that Syed Shahid witnesses had made a significant improvement before the trial court on his statements made to the police during the investigation of the case and that he was a bad accused in the trial. To the extent that the trial court denied, such witnesses cannot be trusted against the accused, especially when statements of four witnesses were not received. During the investigation of the case, the charge of recovering the gun from the possession of the accused was legally unforgivable as no crime was saved from the place of the gun which was allegedly recovered from the possession of the accused. According to the medical evidence, the controversial ocular account of the long-running controversy between the parties to the massacre, was an acknowledged fact and intention that removed both dimensions, it would be unsafe to rely on accountants alone. The relevant, unethical, and HCI witnesses presented by the prosecution in the case were denied by the trial court for failing to obtain any autonomy by the story of the five accompanying accused prosecutors, Failure to prove this case against the defendant cannot be safely ruled out. The accused, beyond reasonable doubt, conviction and conviction, was set aside by the trial court against the accused, and the accused acquitted on the charge that he was acquitted. advocate from Qasba Gujrat lawyer