DOST MUHAMMAD versus STATE
Articles 221, 227, 237, 238 and 561A Accusing and altering the charge The accuser of the jurisdiction shall not mean that the accused was guilty, but his purpose was to inform him of the matter on which he was charged. Was to charge against. The charge against the accused will not prevent him from proceeding with his version. The charge will only enable the court to begin the trial and after recording the evidence, decide whether such an allegation was made against the accused. When the charge was for a major crime, it proved to be a minor offense. , The accused can be convicted of a minor offense, but the accused charged with minor offense could not be punished for any major offense. The accused could have been convicted of a crime that was presented against him after the recording of the evidence and the court was not obliged to sentence him. According to the indictment, subject to the limitation provided under Chapter 227 of PCP Pensions, the CRPC authorized the court to change or add any four at any time before the verdict. unced
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Ahmadpur East lawyer