Find a Lawyer

NISAR AHMED BUTT versus HASAN NAWAZ TARAR, SPECIAL SECRETARY EDUCATION (SCHOOLS), PUNJAB, LAHORE

The R7 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199, affirms the contempt of court petition for promotion to the service tribunal entitled to consider the applicants in accordance with the rules for repeating the development in BS 18 and 19 under these four. was found. The official tribunal's formula of formula was not implemented by the authorities, the applicants had filed a constitutional petition stating that the authority was instructed to implement the tribunal's decision under which the authorities also It was not complied with, the petitioners filed a contempt of court petition, which was dealt with on the basis of the intimation given by the authorities which shows that the decision of the service tribunal should be implemented within a month. Applicants for the first time will be asked if it has not been complied with The yen court petition was filed with the departmental authorities, taking the position as applicable. The applicants were not eligible for promotion as applicants as headmaster as they did not have MA / MCC degree rules. Was required and under the circumstances they could not be advertised in BS 18. Such an objection was not taken before the service tribunal. Applicants were promoted as headmasters in accordance with the rules in 1983 1984 and in the earlier constitutional petitions or contempt of court, and at the same time, the present dispute was only related to their development. Was in accordance with the rules and recruitment procedures. An MA / M secretary degree was required for promotion to the position of Principal and for promotion of applicants in section B. Q advocate from Adda Shaiwala lawyer