Find a Lawyer

HAJI BASHIR AHMAD versus STATE

Crimes against the accused under Section 295C, PPC prosecution to prove a case against the accused, as indicated in Section 295A and 295C Criminal Code (v. 1898), Section 374 Evidence Defined. Had proved. The five audio cassettes with the prosecution's witnesses, who are allegedly derogatory remarks, on various occasions in their own voices have accused the accused of misleading them with any hostility, rape of the prosecution's witnesses, Illegal desire, hostility, and the opposite purpose were not met. The perpetrator of the death sentence, all the prosecution's witnesses were free and reliable and there was no reason to deny them; there was no contradiction in the statements of the prosecution's witnesses regarding the nature of the charges against the accused. While appearing as a witness, he clearly stated that no one had a false desire of the prosecution witnesses or to make false statements against him or her to be involved in this case through the prosecution's oral statements from the prosecution's witnesses. Without any doubt he was able to prove his case against the accused, besides the complaint Nanda of the resolution approved by the relevant District Council on the application submitted by the procession of people are out of town it was displayed. It eliminated the possibility of the defendant being lied to by the prosecution's witnesses for any unlawful activity or outcast of any allegedly recorded offending comment by the accused and by the accused, Which was otherwise presented as merely a piece of evidence. Not dependent on the record jobs for advocates from Tibba Sultanpur lawyer