Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MALIK MUHAMMAD AMIN versus ZAHID MEHMOOD


The preliminary assumption under Section 118 of the Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), O XXXVII, Rr 1 & 2 for the recovery of money on promise note is the preliminary assumption under the Settlement Instrument Act, 1881 The device is designed, manufactured, accepted and validated for consideration even though it is rejected, but the person is still accused of trying to prove and prove the same allegation. Will refuse to consider. It was obliged to prove that the promissory note / receipt was without consideration, which is why it is conditional in view of section 118. The Debate Instruments Act, 1881, the plaintiff's claim that no payment was made to the witnesses, to no avail, because the pro note could be implemented to ensure payment of financial obligation. The trial court's order against the defendants was not interfered with. Appeal by High Court \ r \ n

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Quaidabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.