Find a Lawyer

MST. RIFFAT JEHAN versus HABIB BANK LIMITED

Sections 7, 10 and 21 of Law E-Testimony (10 of 1984), Arts 84 and 59 Apply for Leave Approval and Defend the Case Defendants' Controversy Over Fraud Signs and Thumb Impressions Visual Comparison of Signatures and Thumb Impressions Effect by the court without expert opinion and assistance of the parties If the court does not seek the opinion of an expert, it should express it in the order and reflect the decision, appropriate skills. The court in the field of expertise, competence and knowledge, based on which, has been compared and the result extracted, restored The skill of examining the mark (thumb impression) is not usually the skill of the judge, so, essentially, the opinion of the expert should have been resorted to, but in the present case the court signed the defendant's signature and thumb. Rejected the request for expert opinion based on the views of Controversial documents result from such a mistake by the court that caused injustice to the defendant's case, who, on leave, pleaded with the court that it was necessary to appear in the case that the defendants should have ? The opportunity involved in this case was quite a question of law and fact, to provide the opportunity that any fraud had been committed to them and no evidence could be inferred in the nature of the negative evidence against them. Who used to come under his jurisdiction. Serious and malicious disputes, too, should have led the court to proceed, as a result, and after hearing the matter, the court's decision and the banking corps. criminal advocate from Ghuzdar lawyer