Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ARSHAD versus SECRETARY, LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, LAHORE

R9 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition Re-auction Applicant, in the present case, did not participate in the auction but challenged the same in the technical basis constitutional petition, not to mention the secure price in the auction notice. There was no defect of the nature on which the entire auction activity was canceled. Such interval was merely an accident / procedure and could not be credited, especially when the highest bid was 50% over last year. The auction proceeds and above all, the auction proceedings were fairly transparent and the applicant had no malpractice in these proceedings. , Could not identify unfair treatment or patriotism as they were scanned by the General House of the Town Municipal Administration while all necessary documents, including the agreement between Council Parties, were approved and successful, as approved by the Town Meeting. The bidder entered the job on July 9, 2004 and on this occasion, pulling the carpet off his feet, could not be justified on the basis of any law or canon based petition known to the administration for the petitioner. In this case, proceedings to file an appeal before the Secretary There is no reason. , The local government of the province, and at the same time not being a grieving person within the meaning of Article 199 of the Constitution, their application was not enforceable except by any power and it was rejected \ r \ n us immigration advocates from Feroz Walla lawyer