ADNAN BASHIR KAYANI versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL, ANTI-CORRUPTION, ESTABLISHMENT PUNJAB, LAHORE
Section 420/468/471/161 Corruption Prevention Act (Second of 1947), Section 5 (2) Punjab Anti-Corruption Establishment Rules, 1985, R15 (1) (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Constitution Deletion of the FIR of the petition After the Anti-Corruption Establishment apologized to the accused in three inquiries, it was not given the right to terminate the FIR and against it the Rule 15 of the Punjab Anti-Corruption Establishment Rules. 1) Judicial proceedings may be recommended under (b). 1985 Similarly, proceedings against the Tehsil Deputy Tehsildar and termination of the case against the Gurdwara by the Anti-Corruption Establishment Authorities were also under the above rule, for which the accused should have no complaint, Anti-Corruption Establishment Rules, 1985. By the way, they were prosecuted. Neither the executive authority nor the parliament, they were not mandating and were directory in nature. Any action was in violation of any of its principles, so it was not enough to invalidate the FIR. The application was dismissed accordingly
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Khairpur Nathan Shah lawyer