Find a Lawyer

W.T.AS. NOS. 77(IB) TO 82(IB) OF 2001-2002, DECIDED ON 4TH SEPTEMBER, 2004. versus W.T.AS. NOS. 77(IB) TO 82(IB) OF 2001-2002, DECIDED ON 4TH SEPTEMBER, 2004.

Section 17 BCBR Circular No. 11 1994 Dated 17 7 1994 Review of Assistant Commissioner Options Tax Officer Review ???? The amount of money allocated for the plot and the building under construction should cancel the assessment on the basis that The construction should be the cost of the building, according to the price that can be traded in the market rather than the allotment letter justifying the terms and conditions provided that the leaseholder owns the site with another construction company / firm / builder or an individual Do not allow transmissions unless constructed. The work on the plot was completed and the lease process had to be executed after the completion of the building The building was under construction and could not be moved or sold in an incomplete location where the assets were not transferred and could not be added to net wealth. ? \ The amount invested for the acquisition of the plot can only be included in net wealth and not the value of the plot was justified for the assimilation officer for a long time to accept the declared value in which the plot of land was to be paid. The amount of money and the money spent on construction could not be taken under section 17B of the Velvet Tax Act, 1963. Designed by a diagnostic officer in connection with a building \ r \ n best law firms from Jacobabad lawyer