Find a Lawyer

M.AS.- NOS.. 959/LB TO 961/LB OF 2002, DECIDED ON 27TH JANUARY, 2003. versus M.AS.- NOS.. 959/LB TO 961/LB OF 2002, DECIDED ON 27TH JANUARY, 2003.

Evidence for the correction of the error of clause 35 The Assisi argued that the entire evidence presented at the hearing of the appellants escaped consideration by the appellate tribunal, which, under section 35 of the Income-tax Act, 1963, when the record was found wrong. Should be corrected The appellate tribunal was required to make amends under section 35 of the Wealth Tax Act, 1963, because during the appeal order hearing special documents were re-summoned and appeals by the appellate tribunal The original numbers have been restored. criminal advocate from Saidu Sharif lawyer