Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

M.AS.- NOS.. 959/LB TO 961/LB OF 2002, DECIDED ON 27TH JANUARY, 2003. versus M.AS.- NOS.. 959/LB TO 961/LB OF 2002, DECIDED ON 27TH JANUARY, 2003.


Evidence for the correction of the error of clause 35 The Assisi argued that the entire evidence presented at the hearing of the appellants escaped consideration by the appellate tribunal, which, under section 35 of the Income-tax Act, 1963, when the record was found wrong. Should be corrected The appellate tribunal was required to make amends under section 35 of the Wealth Tax Act, 1963, because during the appeal order hearing special documents were re-summoned and appeals by the appellate tribunal The original numbers have been restored.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous high court advocate from Lalamusa lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.