Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD QASIM versus STATE

Sections 302 (a), 392, 397 and 398 were charged with appreciating the evidence even though they were strangers. Prosecutors' witnesses filed an FIR on the telephone based on information conveyed by the prosecution's witness. Was. Witnesses who witnessed the incident came forward to file an FIR, there was no credible evidence linking the accused to the crime commission in the absence of an identity test. The alleged crime weapon was recovered after the arrest of the TT pistol. Fifteen days after the evacuation of the word space, crime vacancies and crime weapons were sent to the firearm specialist more than two months later and both articles were sent to the firebank specialist simultaneously. Discrimination and the delivery of weapons could be delayed and the same dates, the prosecution W The ballistic report of very few results was presented to support the case of Saha since two different weapons were used in the crime case while only one TT pistol was recovered and a firearm expert reported. Two bullets were fired that the conduct of the pistol witnesses was quite unnatural and the evidence stated that the witnesses did not cooperate, delay in filing an FIR in the prosecution case, absence of identification of the accused in the examination, The version of the Ballistic Report and the prosecution lacks delays and explicit disputes, as well as the recovery of criminal weapons, The prosecution's case was made serious. After failing to bring home the prosecution for the weak prosecution, they were tried and convicted by the trial court, how to become a advocate from Khurian wala lawyer