Find a Lawyer

STATE versus KHALID ALI FARIDI

Section 13 (d) and 2 Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act (XV of 1975), Section 7 (2) Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Sections 5 and 29 of the Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Section 417 Appeal against Breath was timely barred because the time limit provided by section 7 (2) of the Terrorism Activities (Special Courts) Act, 1975 was 30 days, but this was an inappropriate order. Section 5 was filed only three months after the approval. The Prohibition Act was not enforced by section 29, even though no reasonable basis was shown for the delay in the case and the appeal was liable because the trial court ruled that the accused was acquitted. Had done. Section 249A, CCPC misinterpreted the evidence on record, but on the basis of its appointment the accused was given the option to subdue the rifle and such authority was transferred from one place to another. The suspects were not recovered after the transfer. o As someone else or his suspension being a civil servant, he shall not deprive himself of the so-called Privilege Section 2 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965, on the application of the provisions of the Ordinance on matters of civil servants holding arms. Was banned. And thus the government-charged ammunition, thus, had committed no crime and was rightfully acquitted. top civil advocates from Lakki Marwat lawyer