Find a Lawyer

FAZAL MAHMOOD versus THE STATE

Charged with the Section 497 Finance Act (II of 2004), Section 32A Customs Act (IV of 1969), Section 156 (1), CLS (81) (82) bail, the permanent rule of law. It was contacted by the exporters and given an incorrect statement regarding the weight, price, quantity and quality of the shipment with the intention of drawing the duty and claiming the return by export bill through the bill and It was alleged that sales tax returns and refunds were not inspected due to lack of details, quantity and cost. According to the statement in the Export Bill, such charges against the accused were declared punishable under section 156 (1) (81) (82) of the Customs Act 1969, punishable by up to three years. May be more or fine or both. And the prohibition clause of section 497 did not occur, Oli was cleared on the CCPC co-accused, against whom the prosecution had a single charge that the case of the accused to be a partner, the rule of consistency required The accused should be stopped. There will also be a guarantee to keep the balance before the law and adhere to the equality theory of all. ask a advocate free from Multan lawyer