Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

NAZEER AHMED BARACH versus STATE


Articles 420, 468, 469 and 471 of the Conan evidence (10 of 1984), Arts 72, 73, 76 and 162 Definitions of evidence Secondary evidence, admissible documents that were presented in evidence by the prosecution, except for the writing expert and the accused Sample signatures report. Unless, in the meaning of Article 76 (c) of the Convention of Contempt, 1984, the accused is admitted before the trial court, the need for regular proof of documentation cannot be presented through legal evidence. As provided by Arts 72 and 73 of the Convention E. Testimony, 1984 Secondary evidence cannot be admissible unless the testimony of the law satisfies one or more of the conditions listed in Article 1984 of 1984 Article 1984, the party presenting such evidence without the contents of the document without proof. Can be entered into the first without first proof of the original evidence was obtained for the reception of the secondary evidence by which the party without any objection to which it was intended or required to be used in the evidence was ordinary. Could not object as Subsequent to the confession of such evidence at any stage thereafter, under the provisions of Article 162 of the Law Evidence, the documents presented by the 1984 litigation, without the preparation of their origin and without satisfactory conditions. Obtaining or obtaining consent or immunity in the conditions necessary to allow proof to object to the receipt of irredeemable evidence cannot be treated as a valid and legal piece of evidence because the rule is such Has a significant impact on the decisions of the courts, if, if they were to be dismissed, the result

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
divorce advocates from Killa Saifullah lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.