Find a Lawyer

BISMILLAH KHAN KAKAR versus STATE

Section 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 186, 504, 506, 147, 148 and 149 of the Representative People Act (LXXXI of 1976), Sections 82 and 82A, before arrest, indictment against the accused and his accomplices. The denial was that they attacked and mistreated the returning officers of the respective constituencies as the Election Commission declared the election of the constituencies invalid and ordered re-election, both the accused and his. The co-accused were named and they were told that they were accompanied by their supporters who attacked the returning officers. The allegations in the FIR were confirmed by the officers, who were present at the time of the incident, the record did not show that either the complainant or any other witness had any reason or falsely accused. Or its accompanying accused has a reason or intent to be involved in the commission and fails to state any other dispute between the parties charged with the crime, which could lead to the complainant or witness being asked to Has a motive against the accused. The allegation against the false allegations in this case is that it sought to declare the election by force, which was declared invalid by the Election Commission, saying that the representation of the public in this case was AAA. Was charged under. The Act 1976, which imposed a sentence of imprisonment that could extend the penalty of pre-arrest bail up to 5 years, did not equate to the grant of bail after arrest, as presented by the Supreme Court in PLD 1983. ? SC, 82, was not available in the present case Pakistan, top advocate family court from Nooriabad lawyer