MALIK KHALID HUSSAIN versus STATE
Section 497 Prohibition (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Arts 3 and 4 Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (C) bail, the associate's defendant's grant declared innocent by the investigating officer while the accused About 1/2 month after the incident, when the accused did not recover anything from the police, the police did not try to find out whether the employee was actually hired from the house by the accused owner. Were done. The court affirmed an affidavit for the statement that it had not rented any house for the accused nor received any recovery from the house. The fact is that the accused was not arrested on the spot and was charged by the police about 1 / 1/2 months after that. Recovery was sufficient to make it a suitable case for a bail grant, the accused was admitted in bail, under conditions
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Chilas lawyer
