Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SALEEM AKHTAR versus SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE/RENT CONTROLLER

Section 13 (6) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition Temporary Rental Order Applicants / Tenants disagreed on the validity of the temporary rental order approved by the Rent Controller, saying that the documents were examined and After the scrutiny, the order was to be passed. In the case of the parties hearing, the procedure was not followed by the tenant controller in which the case of the tenant was before passing the unknown order under Section 13 (6) of the West Pakistan civilian rent. Parties had to be instructed to submit documents and record their statements. The Banning Ordinance, 1959, and the landlord's version should not be immediately believed that in the presence of both parties' advice to approve the order, the validity was denied and the rent controller provided an opportunity for a hearing and The applicant's version was also considered. Respondent is not required to instruct the parties to furnish documents to the parties in all cases. It was his sweet will to submit the documents to the parties that he deemed necessary to support his version of the case. The case was not suitable for the exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction because the rent controller had approved it in his jurisdiction and It could not be declared illegal. Or illegal constitutional application, was rejected in the circumstances ask a advocate free from Makli lawyer