Find a Lawyer

MRS. FAUZIA AMAN ULLAH versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB

Article 199 Constitution Petition Civil Service Appointment The applicant was an ad hoc lecturer and served in the service from 1996 to 2000 and his tenure expired on 30 6000 and was terminated by the Authority. Requests were requested through 's advertisement. In light of the Supreme Court's decision to regularize their services, the ad was later changed to the effect that the former ad hoc lecturer and former ad hoc subject specialist. Both men and women, whose terms of appointment were terminated and terminated on 30 6000, but were not petitioned before the Supreme Court, were eligible to apply to the Public Service / Commission for regularization of their services. The applicant was interviewed for the service he applied for regularly in compliance with the proposed advertisement, but a rejected letter was sent to the applicant by the authority. Firstly, on the basis that his services were not terminated on 30 6 2000 and secondly, his request was not valid as he was not a party before the Supreme Court, in view of this amended advertisement on both grounds. The grounds were unfounded, as ad hoc employees under whom services were terminated on 30 6 2000 and those who were not parties to litigation before the Supreme Court were eligible to apply for regularization of their services. The constitutional petition was allowed with the directive that the applicant's case be considered for regularization of its merits and so on. According to this announcement. r \ n tax advocates from Patoki lawyer