HAJI FAZAL-UR-REHMAN versus ABDUL HAFEEZ ALIAS BABAR
In accordance with section 13 (6) section 13 (6), in compliance with the rent controller's order, the West Pakistan Civil Rent Restriction Ordinance, 1959 where the tenant was collecting the rent by the tenant. It was approved and the landlord failed. To raise an objection at this stage, the mandate was not deliberately violated under Section 13 (6) of the Ordinance, nor was the landlord alleged by the tenant controller that the purpose of the deposit was to rent it out. Take advantage of It could not be justified in light of the submission, the landlord's knowledge of the progress and the approval of the rental controller's objection and the complaint of the landlord's complaint regarding the return, an appropriate form of rent controller. The order can be refined or explained. The tenant had taken up the task of extending his full support and not depriving the tenant of his right to defend his tenancy. At present, being of a technical nature, the necessity and purpose of section 13 (6) of the Ordinance. Did not stand in the way of fulfillment or the order passed by the rent controller for this matter under the above provisions
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Mehmood Kot lawyer