CH. MUHAMMAD ILYAS WARRAICH versus STATE
Trial court received interim relief almost five months ago in two cases of denial of bail, section 420/468/471, arrest of section 498 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), but on both occasions they were presented to the court for confirmation. Failed to occur. His conduct of the bailiff accused shows that he has been playing acrobatics with the court and that even after five months of his abuse of bail and misappropriation of the exemption, the accused is still Was successfully successful in discharging the law and accordingly the investigating officer, he did not join the investigation, denied the fact that the accused confessed that he had nothing to do with his co-accused. He and his co-accused were making a joint plea for bail before the arrest and also filed a joint constitutional application to terminate the FIR The accused has been taking contradictory stance before the trial court and the accused in the High Court was not able to identify any defect or wrongdoing. About the complainant or the police so that he can be involved in a lie
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Hafizabad lawyer