Sections 302 (b) / 324/34 / 337F (iii) / 337D Defendants of murder, Kutel excellent attempt, joint intentions, Ghatif Jaffa case, Definition of medical evidence among the parties to dispute medical evidence The plea was not valid when the alleged gunmen ambushed and killed the casualties, and the injured witness was the motivator of the incident and the dispute between the parties was strained for a period of 4 to 5 years. The complainant was the brother of the accused and the injured witness was also related to the accused, but their evidence could not be easily dismissed because of their relationship. The matter was registered within two hours by the police and enmity between the parties was filed. Done and the prosecution successfully proved it. The presence of the injured witness at the scene of the incident cannot be questioned for the purpose of the incident and it was fully confirmed before the police, as stated in its statement under Section 161, CCP Medical evidence from CK supports the testimony of the ocular account as both the deceased and the injured witness suffered severe sharp injuries, the period passed between the injured and the dead, and all the complainants between the death and the post-mortem examination. And according to the ocular account presented by the injured witness, the medical officers were subjected to a detailed investigation but they There were no errors found in the statements of, for example, regarding the recovery of weapons. The chemical examiner's report revealed that the weapon was stained with blood and was sent to a serologist and that the weapon was humane, which was recovered from the accused and his skull.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
